By: jonmiller on 3/13/10
+1

By: amomof2 on 3/13/10
Agreed, this is a win-win situation. I would think that if there were renovations/maintenance to be made; an attempt should be made to fix them. We are keeping the doors open to another school in the community instead of closing down and letting the building go to waste. We are allowing a reputable charter school to obtain a home. It getting old hearing of such competitiveness b/w private,charter,public schools, Our goal is and should be to offer as much to our children educationally as possible!

By: onevoice on 3/12/10
Concerning Southside, are there any renovations/put off maintanence issues, that need to be performed on any part or function of the building? If there were, at what/who's expense?

By: bleedingheart on 3/12/10
But would the school district come up with silly reasons not to lease it to TEAM? I totally agree it would be a win-win situation for all parties involved.

By: forwhatitsworth on 3/12/10
I agree, South Side is a win-win for both TEAM and the public school system. By leasing the South Side building, the money also stays local.

By: jonmiller on 3/11/10
If the school district votes down the use of south side, then shame on them. Like i have said, choices are good for Waseca Schools. My kids will go to sacred heart, team, and public. These are all good choices.
And what are we teaching our kids when we cant work together. And even if families have kids going to team or sacred heart, they still our paying property taxes. Which in turn goes to the school district.