Friday, July 30, 2010 I Welcome Visitor
Welcome Visitor! | login/logout
 

   


Most viewed stories
Dietz pitches school levy proposal
Roundbank acquires failed New Prague bank
Photo Gallery: Relay for Life 2010
Waseca man wins $10K lottery prize
Gardens open for viewing
Athletes and fans will gather for Waseca Triathlon Sunday

NOV
02
Our Two Cents: Social Security increase is unwarranted
By in Our Two Cents: Tim and Marcus Penny
Until 1973, senior citizens on Social Security received no automatic cost of living (COLA) increase. Prior to the creation of a COLA, Congress would decide whether (or not) to increase Social Security payments. Because Congress tended to get overly generous with increases (especially during election years), double-digit percentage increases were not uncommon. So, in some respects, offering an annual COLA – pegged to the inflation rate – was deemed to be better, fairer and cheaper.

Last year, due to the recession, the cost of living went down by 4 percent. Accordingly, seniors are slated to get no COLA increase this coming year. And, in fairness, they should not get one. Yet, President Obama and members of Congress seem intent on giving retired seniors a pay raise anyway.  Congress is currently considering a flat $250 payment to every retiree (rich or poor). That payment will cost the federal government $13 billion (money the government does not have given our huge deficit).

Bear in mind that seniors did get a 5.8 percent increase last year – one of the largest COLAs ever paid.  Social Security beneficiaries also received a tax rebate under the stimulus bill passed before President Bush left office.  And, they were recipients of extra payments under the stimulus plan passed by Congress and signed into law by President Obama last February.

Compared to most workers in America, seniors are faring pretty well in this recession. Ten percent of working age Americans are presently unemployed with another roughly ten percent are underemployed. Few, if any, workers received a pay raise last year and prospects for pay raises this year are doubtful. Yet, these workers will be required to foot the $13 billion bill for this payment to retirees – through taxes in the future to repay today’s deficit spending.

This should not be a complicated decision for Congress.  First, American workers are getting no pay raise.  In fairness, neither should retirees.  Second, the budget is already heavily in the red.  We should not unnecessarily add to that debt. Third, the COLA was created to protect seniors from inflationary costs and this year the cost of living decreased. As a result, no Social Security increase is warranted.

Still, I predict Congress will heed President Obama’s call for a $250 payment to seniors – with money we do not have – because it is the popular thing to do.

That is my two cents.  Tim


Bookmark and Share

Comments

Monday
November 2, 2009
10:40am
Donna Fostveit
I'm a senior living on social security payments and I agree with Tim.
Monday
November 23, 2009
08:30pm
Roger Howland
I AGREE.

Post a Comment

Please login to post a comment.

Search




Video

Photo Galleries

Waseca Marching Jays Fall Preview
20 images / created on Thursday, August 27, 2009 at 9:08 pm

View all galleries>>
Buy photo reprints>>

I35 Marketplace Home

Featured Business:
Top Jobs | Top Homes | Top Cars 
Part time
Experienced Cook
Educational
TECHNOLOGY COORDINATOR
Sales
Insurance Sales
Production
Le Center, MN
Waseca Public School
Building Technology Support
Trades
Green View
ages 55 +
Case Managers
TWO Full Time
Healthcare
Lake Shore Inn
Part time Office
Waseca Public Schools
Federated Insurance
Client Contact Center Representative
Part Time
Part time permanent
Cargill
Process Technician
Healthcare
Part-time Direct Service
Maintenance
Trades Maintenance Technician
Direct Care
Healthcare Direct Care Staff Opening